http://brhlootp.freeforums.net/

The Astros are available

I mean if no one else is jumping on that DFFL Buffalo roster, I'd be happy to give it a go. . .

Will UDFA open tomorrow, commish, or will there be a pause while everything gets moved over? I can't remember how we've done it in years past. May 7th at 9AM ET will be when we'll make UDFAs who went undrafted in your sim league available in free agency. I'll admit, it casued me to double chcek my ...

Goodell wrote:Let's make that penciled draft date official...
DRAFT: Sat-Tues June 2-5

Is there any chance we can turn the Signing Soon feature off on June 1st? I think starting a little later will make the UDFA period more exciting without the cherry picking off the Signing Soon tab.

One year no trade just seems like a crazy correction to a not so serious problem. Players rating fluctuate during the year. If you sign someone to a contract as an 86 and by week 3, that player is a 91 on a good contract; you should be able to cash in on that value. Before the end of the year, that ...

Looks like we have two new prospective GM with no team on the waitlist with Fdean33 and Awaningking. So they would fill two of the spots. "With free agency set to start Saturday, April 28, at 10 AM ET, we'll fill any remaining openings this week prior to that time. We prefer to give openings t...

I just don’t see how we get free agency going this weekend as far as I know we don’t have trading open yet. We still have teams on the openings page. I don’t see the point in rushing things along As long as the voids are filled prior to Friday, I don't see an issue with it. CFFL is full, DFFL is al...

With FA less than a week away, will we see trades opened soon?

I'm in if its PS4. BuffaloBengals14

Waiting like this could help soften the lull of inactivity we see after the playoffs, I wouldn't mind waiting until March. Teams that are out can stay active instead of being frozen for two months. That's just my opinion, enjoy the Super Bowl everyone. As a Bills fan, I know who I'm pulling for but ...