The idea isn't to restrict trading, in my opinion. It is to prevent teams from using salary cap to obtain picks. Ex: I sign a player to a 3 year deal 1 mil per year, and 30 mil SB. I'm not competing, so I'll eat that 30mil, and land some pretty good value for giving away a player signed for 1mil per...

I believe a 1 year no trade clause should be only if the SB is more than 10million dollars.

unless they are on the injury report... they play.



I'm not certain what we do for QB and RB...

Merry Christmas everyone!

I'm going this afternoon. I heard it got a standing ovation.

I think this is an obvious "use last year's averages" thing.


If there happens to be rookies... use next week's stats for them only.

I love the new set up. I've already blown most of my SB money. This is a great way to ensure that teams don't sign 30 UDFA's... just because they have the cap space.

hahaha... ISBL, so much fun. That ended something like 12 years ago I think.

Ben C. wrote:
Yes, I believe someone in the AFFL fielded a team of 4 TEs in the early years. That didn't seem realistic, so we implemented the minimum/maximums in the depth chart.

Like there was any doubt.... IT WAS ME!!!


Personally, I loved my 4 TE sets... we were bad asses!

along those lines... it is a MAXIMUM of 3 TE's