Yeah, me too I think. I don't see what's the hurry anyway, it's only gonna be 4 months of nothingness after our draft is over. I agree, I am in a unique place, being the only resident of china in the league and the draft times take place at night for me, if they were spread out longer, we could do ...

Jared A wrote:Yeah he wouldn't get two firsts if he was tagged at 25 mil

Exactly! I couldn't keep Ngata last year because i had to pay 120% of last years payment because it was more than franchise. Just checking rules haven't changed.

Just think he shouldn't be able to offer the contract that is LESS than what he paid last year, without hitting FA

Manning is tagged in Cffl, but at 14 million. Last year he made 21 million. I thought a franchised player couldn't make less than last year?

Umm, actually it is make believe, and real teams with real money don't drive the price up on a guy they have no intention of signing. The reality is IRL, we always hear rumors, but the majority of the time its simply agents trying to get their players more money. IRL if you were throwing out money ...

I understand the reasons behind anoynomous bidding, but we don't have the resources for inside information like the real NFL. I can't scout other teams and know what they are thinking like the real NFL, the only way I can do that is through seeing what they are bidding on. Now I get that some owner...

I understand the reasons behind anoynomous bidding, but we don't have the resources for inside information like the real NFL. I can't scout other teams and know what they are thinking like the real NFL, the only way I can do that is through seeing what they are bidding on. Now I get that some owners...

I could support this during the season, as that would make sense, but during the offseason, so much is going on, is it really necessary.

Knowing who is bidding against me is crucial when I am considering counter bids

I am not sure the reasoning behind wanting this rule. The reason it works the way it does in the NFL is because they have scouting departments, media sources and the players PHYSICALLY visiting teams to know what is going on. We don't have that, so why hide the names? I think the bigger bidding issu...

I'm all for having some type of standard! Either it be 10 wins or whatever we come up with. I think that before a GM loses his team, he is given a fair chance to explain why he wasn't able to meet the standard. I also think there is a bigger factor to consider, and that is how active is the GM? Yes...