I think it might be a good idea to be able to "accept" trades prior to them being processed. So, if rosters are locked, and you accepted a trade, it goes through once things are open. I'm not complaining or upset with anyone, but I had agreed to a trade early last week.... Pit was sending ...

Matthew Stafford in real life week 5 went... 19-25 (76%) with 3 TD's I then had a max advantage of 15% to boost that, but he finished... 31-51 (61%) with 3 TD's The 4th quarter Stafford went 9 for 27 (30%). I understand that once he gets past his update, it reverts back to a normal update (like 50/5...

HAHAHA... holy crap, I was looking at a recent news from NOVEMBER. LOL


Well, I have an extra kicker if anyone's interested

Another example is this... I just made a trade in AFFL for Dustin Hopkins. Nick Folk was just put on IR in real life. So, I am sitting at 54 until I can put Folk on IR. I have no interest in cutting him, just placing him on reserve.

Yeah, as long as someone isn't completely abusing the current system, I also don't see much need for a change. The benefits for strict enforcement don't really justify all the extra work.

I may have missed this somewhere, but are we going to do a draft? Or are we going to stick with what the team's actually did?

Here's a thought... what if we just kept drafting? After 7 rounds, we have basically comp picks. Fill your que if you want to sign players. 10 minutes per pick... if your que isn't filled, you're simply skipped?

Of course not tradeable.

We should just incorporate a rule that the SB can only be half of the value of the contract. The rest has to be in salary.

I think we should do away with unlimited bids also. Switch it to that you can place bids on your players prior to the start of FA. (So, you get the first offer in)

me neither