2024 RULES: Free Agency Bids (Backloaded/RB)

Should back-loading and roster bonuses be removed from free agent bidding options?

BACK-LOADED: Remove as not used much and potential loopholes from ever paying player full salary
22
22%
BACK-LOADED: Keep it as option
13
13%
BACK-LOADED: Keep it as option but mark those to prevent from being able to be restructured additionally
9
9%
BACK-LOADED: Keep it and expand for even more options for contract flexibility like front-loading too
9
9%
ROSTER BONUS: Remove it to simplify things as essentially just additional salary for bidding purposes
13
13%
ROSTER BONUS: Keep it as real element in contracts to also have here and adds to our game with deadlines for annual RB payments
36
35%
 
Total votes: 102

JonC
Posts: 343
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:10 pm

Re: 2024 RULES: Free Agency Bids (Backloaded/RB)

Post by JonC »

Goodell wrote: Tue Feb 27, 2024 2:54 pm
JonC wrote: Tue Feb 27, 2024 12:00 pm Commish, would it be a heavy lift to add a block on restructuring for any backloaded contract in the programming?
No at the time of signing a back-loaded deal, it would just flip the switch saying it's restructured like we do with restructured contracts to prevent them from being restructured twice.
I swapped my vote to this.
DFFL Steelers GM: '13-'22
Regular Season Record: 77-85 (.475)
Division Championships: ’13, ’14, ’19
AFC WC Team: ’20

AFFL Bills GM: '20-?
Regular Season Record: 20-30 (.400)

BRFL Chargers GM: '21-?
Regular Season Record: 17-17 (.500)
AFC WC Team: '22
Goodell
Posts: 3810
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 3:44 am
Contact:

Re: 2024 RULES: Free Agency Bids (Backloaded/RB)

Post by Goodell »

CONCLUSION: With free agency approaching next week (4/15), we'll keep back-loaded and roster bonus options, as well as see if we can also add front-loaded flexibility. To avoid some of the issues with back-loaded deals that could result in a player never being paid more than 50% of his bid salary for multiple seasons, we'll have back-loaded deals be checked that they cannot be restructured again as they are essentially a restructured deal from the start and we don't have contracts being restructured twice.
Official Statement from the Commissioner's Office
Post Reply